
The House of Representatives recessed on July 23 and is scheduled to return to Washington on August 31. The Senate will adjourn for its August recess at the end of this week, although leadership may extend voting sessions into the weekend if additional time is needed to complete outstanding legislative priorities. Senators are not expected to return until September 14.
During the August recess period, legislative updates will be issued on a more limited basis as Congress is out of session. However, once lawmakers return in September, our updates will resume at full pace as Congress addresses the many legislative priorities awaiting action this fall.
We wish you a happy, healthy, relaxing, and safe August, and we look forward to reconnecting when Congress returns in September.
Before departing, the Senate considered several key items, including:
The Senate continued efforts to confirm Todd Blanche as Attorney General. Sen. Lee (R-UT) indicated he may attempt to force a vote to delay or cancel the Senate recess in order to debate and vote on the SAVE America Act, an election security measure supported by President Trump and Senate Republicans. If brought to the floor, the effort is expected to fail.
The Senate Agriculture Committee moved forward with its efforts to advance a comprehensive farm bill, with Chairman Boozman (R-AR) leading the committee’s markup on Thursday. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), signed into law in July 2025, already provided important support for the dairy industry by reauthorizing and expanding the Dairy Margin Coverage (DMC) program for calendar years 2026 through 2031. The Senate farm bill builds on that foundation by including several additional dairy provisions supported by producers and cooperatives.
Key Policy Issues in Senate Farm Bill Text - One notable provision in the Senate proposal would provide a one-year delay of certain Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) state cost-share requirements included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Congressional Democrats have advocated for a longer, two-year delay, and it remains uncertain whether Democrats will support the one-year extension.
The bill also includes a provision allowing for year-round sales of E15 ethanol, a longstanding priority for agricultural and biofuel interests. Several other controversial provisions that been discussed during farm bill negotiations are not included in the current base text, including:
• Federal pesticide preemption language; and
• Provisions addressing California’s Proposition 12 livestock production standards.
Dairy Priorities Included in Base Text - The current Senate farm bill text includes several provisions important to the dairy industry and the NDFC, including:
• Authorizing mandatory cost and yield surveys to ensure future changes to the Federal Milk Marketing Orders are based on current market conditions, building on investments included in the Working Families Tax Cuts legislation.
• Extending the Dairy Indemnity Program and the Dairy Promotion and Research Program, while making the Dairy Forward Pricing Program permanent.
• Supporting voluntary, producer-led conservation programs, including the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), while maintaining dedicated conservation funding opportunities for livestock producers.
• Streamlining certification for conservation Technical Service Providers to improve producer access to qualified technical assistance.
Expanding Trade and Market Opportunities
• More than doubling funding for the Market Access Program (MAP) and Foreign Market Development (FMD) program to expand agricultural export opportunities.
• Directing USDA and the U.S. Trade Representative to prioritize efforts defending common food names in international markets.
• Establishing the Dairy Nutrition Incentive Program and expanding eligibility for additional milk, yogurt, and cheese products.
• Creating a new FDA pathway for approval of innovative feed additive products designed to improve efficiency in dairy production.
• Expanding opportunities for animal health programs to receive additional funding through annual appropriations.
• Increasing authorized funding for Dairy Business Innovation Initiatives that support dairy product development, processing, marketing, and distribution.
• Clarifying that whole milk may be served in school breakfast programs.
• Expanding opportunities for farmers to partner with local food distribution organizations to provide locally produced foods, including milk and other dairy products, to eligible community institutions.
• Improving the Farm and Ranch Stress Assistance Network and increasing funding opportunities through annual appropriations.
NMPF, along with the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and many similar associations including 112 members of Congress, urged U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer to pursue a strong extension of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) that strengthens North American competitiveness and addresses outstanding trade concerns.
The bipartisan congressional effort was led by Rep. Yakym (R-IN), who joined lawmakers in expressing support for Ambassador Greer’s efforts to secure a high-quality agreement that benefits American manufacturers, farmers, ranchers, workers, service providers, energy producers, and businesses across the country.
In a letter to Ambassador Greer, lawmakers thanked the U.S. Trade Representative for his efforts to ensure a level playing field for American industries and emphasized the importance of using the USMCA Joint Review process to strengthen the agreement. The letter highlighted that July 1 marked the statutory date of the USMCA Joint Review, an opportunity for the United States, Mexico, and Canada to evaluate whether the agreement is meeting its commitments and address emerging economic challenges.
Members of Congress noted that the USMCA was the result of extensive negotiations with congressional input and received strong bipartisan support when approved. They emphasized that the agreement has provided greater certainty for businesses, encouraged reshoring of manufacturing, supported job creation, increased wages, promoted innovation, and expanded export opportunities throughout North America and global markets. However, lawmakers argued that the Joint Review process provides an opportunity to address areas where improvements are needed. The letter urged the administration to focus on several priorities, including:
• Securing promised market access commitments that have not been fully realized;
• Addressing new trade actions by Mexico and Canada that negatively impact American manufacturers, agriculture producers, service providers, and workers;
• Countering unfair trade and investment practices from third countries that threaten North American economic competitiveness and American jobs; and
• Improving tariff structures to strengthen regional supply chains and competitiveness in the global marketplace.
While lawmakers expressed support for extending the USMCA, they emphasized that achieving meaningful outcomes should take priority over meeting an arbitrary deadline.
“The desired result is an extension agreed to by the United States, Mexico, and Canada,” the members wrote, while encouraging all three countries to work constructively and efficiently toward an agreement that delivers measurable benefits for North American businesses and workers.
NMPF supported the congressional letter, reinforcing the manufacturing sector’s interest in maintaining a stable, predictable North American trade framework while ensuring that USMCA partners uphold their commitments. As negotiations continue, manufacturers and lawmakers are calling for a strengthened USMCA that promotes investment, protects American jobs, and ensures North America remains competitive in the global economy.
Congress is moving toward another short-term government funding measure as lawmakers work to avoid a shutdown while negotiations over Fiscal Year 2027 appropriations continue. On July 21, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 9770, legislation that would extend government funding at current levels from the end of the fiscal year on September 30 through December 4. The measure received limited bipartisan support, with six Democrats joining Republicans in voting for passage.
The Senate Appropriations Committee has since released its version of a continuing resolution, which would fund the government through December 11. The Senate proposal includes several funding adjustments, or “anomalies,” requested by the administration to address specific program needs during the extension period. However, the Senate package does not include the substantial increase in defense funding sought by the administration. It also contains provisions limiting certain executive branch actions during the funding extension, including temporarily preventing the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) from finalizing a proposed rule requiring senior political appointee approval of federal grants. That restriction would remain in effect only for the duration of the continuing resolution.
Additionally, the Senate measure includes language prohibiting new funding from being used for immigration enforcement activities during the temporary funding period.
Senate Majority Leader Thune (R-SD) is expected to bring the legislation to the Senate floor for an initial procedural vote as leadership works to advance the measure before the chamber begins its August recess.
Despite Senate action, the funding bill will not take effect unless the House approves the Senate version when lawmakers return in September. With differences between the two chambers remaining unresolved, negotiations are expected to continue throughout the recess period as Congress works toward a final agreement before the September 30 funding deadline.
Congress is taking steps toward a potential third budget reconciliation package after the House of Representatives approved its Fiscal Year 2027 budget resolution on July 22. The House passed H. Con. Res. 113, which would establish the framework for future reconciliation legislation by directing four House committees — Armed Services, Intelligence, Agriculture, and Administration — to develop legislation addressing key Republican priorities. Under the budget resolution, the committees would be instructed to prepare legislation providing:
• Up to $73 billion for defense and intelligence priorities;
• $12 billion in agricultural assistance; and
• $10 billion to support state election security programs.
The resolution is intended to begin the reconciliation process, allowing legislation to move through Congress with expedited procedures and avoiding the Senate filibuster threshold typically required for major legislation.
President Trump has urged Senate Republicans to approve their own budget resolution before the chamber leaves for the August recess. However, the President has also called for the Senate measure to include instructions for addressing the federal debt ceiling. Republicans increased the debt limit by $5 trillion, from $36.1 trillion to $41.1 trillion, as part of last year’s reconciliation package. Current projections indicate the federal government will reach the new limit sometime next year. The President has argued that addressing the debt ceiling sooner would provide greater flexibility before the 2026 midterm elections. His position is based on the expectation that if Democrats gain control of one or both chambers, they could seek policy concessions in exchange for supporting a future debt ceiling increase.
White House Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought encouraged Senate Republicans to focus the current budget resolution and any resulting reconciliation package on the administration’s immediate spending priorities. He has suggested that a debt ceiling increase could instead be addressed through a potential fourth reconciliation package during the post-election lame-duck session.
Senate Republicans are also considering whether to significantly increase the amount of defense funding included in their version of the budget resolution. Senate Majority Leader Thune has not indicated that he intends to bring a budget resolution to the Senate floor before the August recess. Under the Budget Act of 1974, any senator may force the Senate to vote on a motion to proceed to consideration of a budget resolution. While such an effort would likely fail, it could create political pressure on Republican senators who oppose moving forward with the measure before the recess. Negotiations are expected to continue as Senate Republicans determine the scope, timing, and priorities of a potential reconciliation package heading into the fall legislative session.